PROJECT AIM

To examine whether the Multi Agency Tasking and Coordination (MATAC) approach to managing high-risk, high-harm domestic abuse perpetrators reduces re-arrest rates compared to standard criminal justice processes. Additionally, to evaluate whether the risk assessment tool (DARAT) used to select perpetrators for MATAC is effective and appropriate.

WHY IT MATTERS

Given the significant resources invested in programmes such as MATAC, it is essential to understand whether this approach achieves its intended aim of reducing repeat offending and improving community safety. The DARAT risk assessment tool plays a key role in deciding which perpetrators are referred to MATAC. If the tool does not identify the right individuals, the programme may not be used as effectively. Evaluating both the programme and the tool ensures that public resources are used efficiently and interventions target those who pose the greatest risk.

APPROACH

Using existing police data, the study will compare perpetrators managed under MATAC with similar perpetrators managed through routine criminal justice processes. To ensure a fair comparison, offenders’ risk profiles in both groups will be matched based on several factors. Additional statistical analysis will then assess whether MATAC is associated with changes in re-arrest rates over time. The reliability and suitability of the DARAT risk assessment tool will also be examined.

IMPACT

The results will inform decisions about continued investment and implementation of MATAC. Evaluation of the DARAT tool will support better referral decisions.